Legal Opinion
Danow v. Penn Central Transportation Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 24, 1977PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
153 N.J. Super. 597 (1977)
380 A.2d 1137
RUTH DANOW, ADMINISTRATRIX AND ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT DANOW, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY AND ITS TRUSTEES, RICHARD C. SINANSKY, QUIGLEY COMPANY, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided October 24, 1977.
Messrs. Heilbrunn, Finkelstein, Heilbrunn, Garruto and Galex, attorneys for plaintiffs (Mr. Robert E. Goldstein on the brief).
Messrs. Strong & Gavarny, attorneys for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Markey v. SkogNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Bergen v. KOPPENALSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Dambro v. Union Cty. Pk. Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- English v. Newark Housing AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Holmes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Polyard v. TerryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Marley v. Palmyra Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Wittkowski Ex Rel. Wittkowski v. State, Corrections DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kenney v. Scientific, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Christmas v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.