Legal Opinion

1940 ROUTE 9, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER, NEW JERSEY

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 31, 2024No. 3:18-cv-08008Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 1940 ROUTE 9, LLC, Civil Action No. 18-8008 (PGS) (RLS) Plaintiff, Y. MEMORANDUM OPINION TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER, NEW AND ORDER JERSEY, Defendant. SINGH, United States Magistrate Judge. PRESENTLY before the Court is a Motion by Plaintiff 1940 Route 9, LLC (“Plaintiff”), seeking to compel a continued deposition of Defendant Township of Toms River, New Jersey (“Defendant” or “Township’”) pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 104), Defendant oppeses the Motion, to which Plaintiff has replied. (Doc.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  2. Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  3. Forrest v. CorzineDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
  4. American Nat. Red Cross v. Travelers Indem. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  5. Harris v. StateDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API