Legal Opinion

Topol v. Smoleroff Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1942PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

Plaintiff, Abram Topol, and defendant Samuel Kane are lessees from the same landlord of separate stores located on opposite ends of the block front on Starling avenue between Odell and Purdy streets, borough of the Bronx, city of New York. Plaintiff has procured an injunction restraining the defendant Kane from selling sodas or candy of any kind in his store, on the theory that such sale violates a restrictive covenant contained in plaintiff’s lease.

Both plaintiff and Kane had been in possession of their respective stores during terms prior to the periods covered by their present leases;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Buffalo Academy of Sacred Heart v. Boehm Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Smith v. LazosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Slice v. Carozza Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Parker v. the Lewis Grocery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Carter v. AdlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Cragmere Holding Corp. v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Berkeley Dev. Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API