Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence Samuel Robinson (84-5140), Charles T. Cornett (84-5141), James Harold Coldiron (84-5158)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1985No. 84-5140, 84-5141 and 84-5158PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants, Charles Cornett, James Coldiron, and Clarence Robinson, appeal from a jury verdict finding them guilty of violating Sections 1962(c) and 1962(d) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (1982). On appeal, appellants individually and collectively raise numerous assignments of error. After careful consideration of each contention, we affirm.
The events relevant to this appeal occurred between July and December 1978 in the “dry” county of Harlan, Kentucky and the “wet” city of Cumberland.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. DohertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. David Shew FeinmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- United States v. Alicia Davis (85-1153), Duane Davis (85-1178), Kenneth Davis (85-1288), Howard Ransom (85-1366)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.