Nieves-Romero v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
When a dangerous condition exists on commercial premises and causes injury to a business invitee, tort liability typically depends on whether the owner/occupier knew or reasonably should have known of the existence of the dangerous condition. In the case at hand, the district court concluded that the summary judgment record contained no significantly probative evidence of the defendant’s knowledge (actual or constructive) of the dangerous condition and entered judgment accordingly. After careful consideration, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
For ease in exposition, we treat this…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1398, 35 fed.r.serv.3d 395 Miguel Angel Ayala-Gerena v. Bristol Myers-Squibb Company, D/B/A Bristol Myers-SquibbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Houlton Citizens' Coalition v. Town of HoultonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Ruiz Rivera v. Dept. of EducationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- García-Catalán v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Mancini v. City of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Perry v. RoyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Garcia-Catalan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Rando v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.