Legal Opinion

Hennemier v. Morris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 29, 1934No. 23565PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. The operator of a motorcycle has the right to assume that the operator of an automobile will obey a municipal ordinance prohibiting any motor-vehicle from being driven over a “stop” sign, at the intersection of two streets, until after the vehicle is brought to a full stop; and the driver of the motorcycle is not guilty of a want of ordinary care or of contributory negligence in acting on such assumption, unless the circumstances are such as to warn him that the operator of the automobile will probably fail to obey the ordinance. And whether the circumstances are sufficient for such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klare v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Elgin Dairy Co. v. ShepherdIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Pederson v. O'RourkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Simonsen v. L. J. Christopher Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Cochran v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Hieber v. WattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Yandle v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Bennett v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Hennemier v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API