Daniel v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
In this case we address whether plaintiff, who was disciplined by the Department of Corrections (his employer) for sexually harassing female attorneys, and who suffered depression as a result of the disciplinary proceedings, is barred from worker’s compensation benefits pursuant to MCL 418.305. MCL 418.305 provides, “If the employee is injured by reason of his intentional and wilful misconduct, he shall not receive compensation under the provisions of this act.” We hold that MCL 418.305 precludes benefits in this case and, therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brackett v. Focus Hope, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. CousinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Brackett v. Focus Hope, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Brackett v. Focus Hope, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Patricia D Brackett v. Focus HopeMichigan Supreme Court · 2006