Legal Opinion

Waltanen v. Wiitala

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1960No. Docket 46, Calendar 48,502PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The point here is a narrow one. It has to do with a directed verdict by the trial judge upon the ground of assumption of risk.

The suit arises out of an automobile accident. The plaintiff, Felix Waltanen, was a passenger in a car driven by bis friend, defendant Wilmer Wiitala. The ride during which the accident occurred followed an evening of drinking, and followed, as well, a pattern of conduct that bad been established for some time. Plaintiff’s, .statement of' facts tells us that, during the spring and summer of 1956, the young men (another friend, Wesley Maki,. was included) made a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Davis v. HollowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Dalton v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Nabozny v. HamilMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Chamberlain v. HaanpaaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Schmidt v. YoungsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API