51 St. Nicholas Realty Corp. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ross, J.
The issue to be determined on this appeal is whether or not plaintiff’s complaint sufficiently states a cause of action for wrongful demolition so as to withstand the defendant-respondent City’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7). Upon review of the allegations of the complaint, applicable sections of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, and the affidavits submitted by parties both in support of and opposition to the motion (Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633, 635), we find that a cause of action for wrongful demolition, sufficient…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Four Seasons Hotels Ltd. v. VinnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Sega v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- O'Dette v. GuzzardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Council of New York v. GiulianiNew York Supreme Court · 1999
- Williams v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- LaLonde v. HurteauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Adams v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Holman v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.