Cytosol Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal Insurance
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH L. TAURO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Cytosol Laboratories, Inc. (“Cy-tosol”) seeks a declaratory judgment that certain claims made against it by Advance Medical Optics, Inc. (“AMO”), are covered under insurance policies issued by Defendant Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”). In turn, Federal seeks a declaratory judgment that the policies provide no coverage, and that Federal has no duty to indemnify or defend in this matter. Cyto-sol also seeks recovery under Massachusetts General Laws chapter 93A, alleging that Federal’s denial of coverage constituted an unfair or deceptive…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Hazen Paper Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Alliance of Auto. Mfrs. v. GwadoskyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sanders v. Phoenix Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- CWC Builders, Inc. v. United Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Appleton v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PADistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024