Legal Opinion
United States v. Karl 'Jack' Schwartzbaum
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 1976No. 9 and 410, Dockets 74-1901 and 75-1337PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:
In United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, decided today, we affirmed the conviction in the Southern District of four officials of the Furriers Joint Council (the Union) for, inter alia, accepting the payment of money from certain employers in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 186(b). 1 In an indictment returned on June 21, 1973, Karl “Jack” Schwartzbaum, a fur manufacturer and appellant herein, was charged with having made four such illicit bribes of $150 each during 1969 and 1970 in an effort to assure union approval for his continuous breach of the collective bargaining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. George StofskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Alphonse PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Wilson TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Edmund RosnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.