Legal Opinion
Lopez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 2001Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Antonio I. Brandveen, J.
The third-party defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation moves for an order granting summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing the complaint of the infant plaintiff and her mother and the third-party plaintiff claims of the defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. The defendant Seárs, Roebuck and Co. moves for an order granting summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing the complaint of the infant plaintiff and her mother.
On July 28, 1996, at about 4:00 p.m., the plaintiff Leilany Lopez, then a three-year-old child, allegedly sustained a cut…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.