Legal Opinion

Defiance Milk Products Company, a Division of Diehl, Inc. v. Richard Lyng, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1988No. 87-3045PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this case is the validity of a temporary amendment to a Department of Agriculture order regulating the marketing of milk in the Ohio Valley Area, 7 C.F.R. part 1033 (1987), pursuant to subsection 8c of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 608c (1982). The District Court granted the Secretary’s motion for summary judgment. We hold that the amendment, though questionable, was supported by substantial evi dence of a temporary glut of milk in the marketplace requiring action to alleviate the burden on certain milk handlers…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. United States v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Arkansas Dairy Cooperative, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. Farmers Union Milk Marketing Cooperative v. YeutterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Burnette Foods, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  5. Cloverland-Green Spring Dairies, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API