Southern Railway Co. v. Florence
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.
The first two grounds of special demurrer objected to that portion of the plaintiff’s petition relating to the position of the train at the crossing. The defendant complains that certain portions of paragraphs 7 and 8 were so vague and, indefinite that the defendant could not tell in what position the train was with reference to the crossing, that is whether it was blocking or only partially blocking the crossing or completely off the crossing. The allegations of the petition show that the train was on the southeastern side of the crossing with the cars between the engine and the crossing,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martin v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Stewart v. MynattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Hand v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Garner v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Shankle v. CrowderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chandler v. Alabama Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- May v. SibleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Mullinax v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.