Legal Opinion

Shankle v. Crowder

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1932No. 8401PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

The ruling announced in the first headnote does not require elaboration.

The witness Mrs. Mulkey, introduced by the propounder, testified that while the alleged testator was being carried in an ambulance to the hospital, immediately after he was shot, the following conversation took place between him and the witness: “Charley told me that he was going to die and he wanted Miss Crowder to have what he had and his car, and I asked him what he had, and he told me. He said he had some notes and a few cattle, and some horses or mules, I don’t know which; and that’s all he said; and I said, Charley,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Credille v. CredilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Smaha v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. State Highway Board v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API