Legal Opinion

Tharaldson v. Unsatisfied Judgment Fund

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1974No. Civ. 8903PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

The appellant, the North Dakota Unsatisfied Judgment Fund, hereinafter the Fund, has appealed from a judgment and order of the Burleigh County District Court, entered December 13, 1973, wherein it was ordered that the Fund pay to the appellee, Ray Tharaldson, $5,000 for bodily injury to Tharaldson, $8,675.20 as costs for medical expenses of Tharaldson, $2,000 as costs for attorney’s fees, and $19 in statutory costs, for an aggregate judgment of $15,694.20. Tharaldson cross-appeals from that part of the district court’s order which limits his recovery for bodily injury…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Glona v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Johnson v. HassettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. Gamble Skogmo, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Nygaard v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bismarck Public School District 1 v. State Ex Rel. North Dakota Legislative AssemblyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Conrad v. SuhrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. BousheeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API