Disbro v. Boyce
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, Judge.
This interlocutory appeal presents a question which appears to be without controlling precedent in Florida. It is: Does Section 90.05 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., ordinarily referred to as the “dead man’s” statute, grant a privilege to an heir or survivor to refuse to testify as to the handling of the assets of his decedent when called as an adverse witness by the personal representative of the deceased in an action by the personal representative against the heir or survivor to recover assets of the deceased? We hold that the statute does not grant a privilege to an heir or survivor to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Doing v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- In Re the Estate of AnnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Ehmke v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re: Thompson's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- McMullen v. St. Lucie County BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Estate of HatcherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Matthews v. MatthewsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Estate of ParsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Mathews v. HinesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1978
- Heebner v. SummerlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.