Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Montana Department of Transportation v. Slack

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2001No. 00-589PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶ 1 The Montana Department of Transportation (“DOT”) appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment issued by the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, awarding litigation expenses, attorney fees, and interest to James and Patricia Slack. The Slacks cross-appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 The parties raise the following issues:

¶3 1. Whether the District Court’s award of litigation expenses incurred through the settlement of the condemnation case was excessive.

¶4 2. Whether the District Court erred by awarding the Slacks their attorney fees…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Crncevich v. Georgetown Recreation CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McGuckinMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re the Estate of SilverMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. HelehanMontana Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chase v. Bearpaw Ranch Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. K & R Partnership v. City of WhitefishMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Montana Department of Transportation v. American BankMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Montana Department of Transportation v. American BankMontana Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API