Legal Opinion

Gooldrup v. Scott Paper Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 28, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTapley, J.

On appeal. The proceedings before the Commission were on a petition for review filed by the employer under authority of Sec. 38, Chap. 31, R. S. 1954. The Commission found that compensation was properly suspended as of June 29, 1956. A Justice of the Superior Court by a pro forma ruling decreed that the compensation was properly suspended. The employee appealed from the decree, which brings the matter before this court.

Arthur P. Gooldrup was employed by the Hollingsworth & Whitney Division of the Scott Paper Company and while so employed suifered injury on April 20, 1956 by striking his head…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  2. Gauthier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  3. Robitaille's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  4. Crowley's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  5. Simmons' CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waltz v. Boston & Rockland Transportation Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  2. Starbird v. Livermore Shoe CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API