Legal Opinion

Pineda v. City of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 9, 2012No. C 11-0457 SBAPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO EXCLUDE

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

The parties are presently before the Court on Defendant City and County of San Francisco’s (“Defendant”) motion to exclude Plaintiffs’ experts from testifying at trial. Dkt. 26. Plaintiffs Jorge Pineda (“Pineda”) and Tita Guzman (“Guzman”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) oppose the motion. Dkt. 30. Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with this matter and being fully informed, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion to exclude, for the reasons stated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Carr v. DeedsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  4. Salgado ex rel. Salgado v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kassim v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  2. (PC) Witkin v. LotersztainDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Angelo v. Thomson International, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. Anthony Vinyards v. Natural Plant ProtectionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API