Legal Opinion

Walter v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1949No. 6 Div. 718Published

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

The appellant was convicted in the court below for violating the provisions of Sections 8 and 9 of what is commonly referred to as the “Bradford Act.” Act No. 298, General Acts 1943, p. 252, Title 26, Sections 383 and 384, Cum. Pocket Part, Code 1940. They are:

“Section 383. Every person shall be free to join ordo refrain from joining any labor organization except as otherwise provided in section 391 of this title, and in the exercise of such freedom shall be free from interference by force, coercion or intimidation, or by threats of force or coercion, *270or by intimidation of or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Baltimore Transit Co. v. FlynnDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1943
  4. May Department Stores Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
  5. In re Suburban Bus Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API