Legal Opinion

Watterson v. New York Central System

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1953No. Civ. No. 1349PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

This action to recover damages for personal injuries was commenced in the State court and removed here on the grounds of diversity of citizenship. Defendants New York Central Railroad Company, referred to hereafter as Central, and Wabash Railroad Company, hereafter referred to as Wabash, appearing specially, have each moved to quash service of process and to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that they were not doing business in Minnesota; that they have no trackage in Minnesota; and that they have never designated or authorized any person as their agent or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Perkins v. Louisville & N. R. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
  4. Gamble-Robinson Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Western Smelting & Refining Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pillsbury Co. v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API