Central Petroleum Corp. v. Korman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
' Saul S. Streit, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint. Since the action is one to set aside conveyances claimed to have been fraudulent and void as to plaintiffs, it is not one of those in which a plaintiff is permitted by rule 113 of the Eules of Civil Practice to apply for judgment in his favor. It follows that defendants may succeed upon this motion only if they establish, solely by “ documentary evidence or official record ”, that plaintiffs do not possess a good cause of action.
Plaintiffs have obtained two judgments against defendants Korman, Volner and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Executive House Realty v. HagenNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Knits 'N' Tweeds, Inc. v. Jones New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978