Nadstanek v. Trask
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.
The parties to this litigation agree that under the common law the liability of a joint mater of a promissory note dies with his death before an action has been instituted to collect said joint obligation. Such was the holding in McLaughlin v. Head, 86 Or. 361 (168 Pac. 614, L. R. A. 1918B, 303); Portland Trust Co. v. Havely, 36 Or. 234, 242 et seq. (59 Pac. 466, 61 Pac. 346); Pomeroy’s Code Remedies (5 ed.), §203; 13 C. J. 574, 575, § 558. See, also, 13 C. J. 574. Plaintiff insists that the common law in that regard was repealed by Section 379, Or. L. The language in Sections 378 and 379…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Slauson v. Schwabacher Bros. & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
- Bostwick v. McEvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Henderson v. KissamTexas Supreme Court · 1852
- Pickersgill v. LahensSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- McCoy v. PayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thompson v. Estate of PetroffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Faircloth v. FinesodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Hindman v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Faircloth v. FinesodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- First Nat. Bank of Portland v. WallOregon Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.