Legal Opinion

Maynard v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 22, 1987No. CA CR 86-30PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John E. Jennings, Judge.

Larry Maynard was convicted in Baxter County Circuit Court of delivery of a controlled substance, after a jury trial. The State’s evidence included the testimony of an accomplice, William Cunningham. The sole argument on appeal is that the evidence corroborating the accomplice’s testimony was insufficient as a matter of law. We affirm.

At the outset we note that Maynard did not raise the issue of the sufficiency of the corroborating evidence at the trail court level, by motion for directed verdict or otherwise. Furthermore, he acquiesced in the court’s instruction which…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Pollard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larry Maynard v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  2. Shamlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  3. McDonald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API