Legal Opinion

Bentley v. Finch

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to set aside judgment. Practice. Before Judge Hansell. Brooks superior court. May term, 1890. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

"We think the court erred, under the facts of this case, in setting aside the judgment. There was no plea filed, the name of counsel was not marked upon the docket, nor was the attention of the court called to the fact that the absent counsel was employed in the case or expected to appear in the same. When counsel is employed in a case — especially in defence of a suit' on an unconditional contract in writing, — it is his duty to file his pleas at the first term of the court, and to mark, or have marked, his name upon the docket. When this is not done, it is the duty of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. TaberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. McDaniel v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harralson v. McArthurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Martin v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Miles v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API