Martin v. Parham

1. Where a motion' to set aside a judgment was filed by two persons, and in a bill of exceptions to the overruling of the motion one of the plaintiffs in error is named and the other is designated merely as “et al.,” in the absence of a motion to amend the bill of exceptions the writ of error will be treated as having been sued out only by the plaintiff in error so named, and the designation of the other party as “et al.” will be disregarded.

2. A judgment by default was rendered on a promissory note on May 8, 1913. On June 5, 1913, a motion to set aside the judgment was filed by the…