Legal Opinion

Ewins v. Washington National Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1940No. Docket No. 24, Calendar No. 41,255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff sued as beneficiary of a health and accident insurance policy issued to her husband. Defendant sold its “combination policy” exclusively to regular readers of a certain newspaper for an annual premium of $5. On the outside df the policy appears in heavy type a recital that the policy provides indemnity for loss of life, either by accident or by sickness, and for loss of limb, sight or time by accidental means, “to the extent herein limited and provided.” Diagonally across this entire text is printed in larger but light red letters the words, “This is a limited policy. Dead…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Drogula v. Federal Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Van Dusen v. Interstate Business Men's Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. Rossman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1947
  3. See v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API