Legal Opinion

Van Dusen v. Interstate Business Men's Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. Docket No. 8PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff, in 1917, was engaged in running a novelty store in Lowell. In October of that year he took a health and accident policy with defendant in which it agreed that in the event of sickness it would pay him the following sums:

“Loss by Disease:

Nonhouse Confinement — $10 a week for 10 weeks.

The insurance provided shall cover only in the event that the insured shall be compelled to refrain from performing any act of business, and be under the constant treatment and care of a regular physician, and during the uninterrupted period of such disability.

House Confinement — $25 a week for 52 weeks.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Letherer v. United States Health & Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Isaacson v. Wisconsin Casualty Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bankson v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Drogula v. Federal Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. LewisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Kirkby v. Federal Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  5. Garvin v. Union Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API