Legal Opinion

Parker v. Parker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1938No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 40,123PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Defendants are trustees of the segregated assets of the Otisville State Bank, and as such they represent the bank’s unpaid depositors. Plaintiff is executrix of the estate of Charles D. Parker, who died December 11,1934. Formerly he had been president, a director, and active officer of the Otis-ville State Bank, and later was appointed conservator of the closed bank. When the bank suspended Charles Parker had a substantial sum on deposit, and for his services as conservator his compensation was fixed at $3,000. Because of the refusal of defendants to pay the administratrix either of these…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Lyons v. BenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Skagit State Bank v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People's Bank v. StroudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Prudential Trust Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Federal Deposit Ins. v. WoodsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1940
  4. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Michael H Bernardi v. Tonya Melynda RockMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API