Kett v. Masker
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from tile First District Court- of Jersey City.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Minturn, J.
The District Court, upon a basis of fact, furnished by the testimony, found that the sale in bulk, in this ■case, to Jaeger, was void as having been made fraudulently in •contravention of the provsions of the so-called Sales in Bulk act. Pamph. L. 1907, p. 570. We think the testimony was ■ample to warrant the finding. There is nothing in the testimony from which we can reasonably infer that either the plaintiff or his vendor, Jaeger, made the slightest pretext to ■comply with the provisions of that act. Their failure to do ■so is defended…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lemieux v. Young, TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Kidd, Dater & Price Co. v. Musselman Grocer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Neas v. BorchesTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Spurr v. TravisMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Thorpe v. Pennock Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Klein v. . MaravelasNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Gazett v. Iola Co-operative Mercantile Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Touris v. KarantzalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In re Central Metallic Casket Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1959
- In re ClaytonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.