Legal Opinion

Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Actiow tried before Jones, J., and a jury, at October Term, 1907, of Cumberland. Plaintiff appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Action was begun 4 June, 1906, to recover damages for an assault committed 19 September, 1904. To rebut the plea of the statute of limitations [Revisal, sec. 397 (3)] the plaintiff relies upon evidence that the deceased attorney or claim agent of the defendant “orally requested plaintiff’s attorney not to bring suit — that he would give the matter his special attention and try to adjust it in some way,” * * * and that “the matter would be settled without suit being brought,” and later, in the summer of 1905, “requested plaintiff’s attorney not to bring suit — to leave, the matter open still…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haymore v. Commissioners of YadkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Hill v. Hilliard & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Sprague v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Tomlinson v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Toms v. Jones.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Town of Franklin v. FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Oliver v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Dickson v. Slater Steel Rig. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Sprague v. . BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API