Legal Opinion

Sprague v. . Bond

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AVERY and CLARK, JJ., did not sit. In his complaint plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to one-half of the net proceeds arising from the sale of certain lands lying in Caldwell County, as the consideration for the execution of a deed to the defendant, Louisa N. Bond, for said lands, under an express contract made contemporaneously with the deed with H. F. Bond, the agent of L. N. Bond, his daughter.

In her answer the defendant, L. N. Bond, expressly alleges that the lands were entered by the plaintiff for her sole benefit, and with her own funds, which she supplied to plaintiff through her…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bullinger v. . MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Burnett v. Wilmington, Newbern & Norfolk Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Watkins v. Kaolin Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. Sprague v. . BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Clements v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. St. John v. LoflandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. . ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Watkins v. Kaolin Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Bailey v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API