Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment Proceedings Against Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bibrer, J.:

An appeal is brought to this court, from an order made by the district court of Oklahoma county, suspending the plaintiff in error, J. L. Brown, pending his trial on charges preferred against him by William A. Wallace, for the purpose of disbarring said Brown from practicing as an attorney at law. The sworn information was filed by Wallace, in the district court, on the 3d day of December, 1894, and on that day a notice was issued, with a copy of the charges and information attached, and directing Brown to appear in the district court of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Walls v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. People ex rel. Moses v. GoodrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Tootle v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. In Re SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API