Legal Opinion

Romero v. Earl

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1991No. 18952PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Justice.

Dr. Charles Romero, a chiropractor, sued attorney Richard Earl in metropolitan court for $2,339.82 pursuant to a “Doctor’s Lien” against settlement proceeds in a worker’s compensation case. The instrument sued upon, signed by the worker, Jesus Rascón, and his attorney, Earl, authorized Romero to release to Earl medical information on Rasón’s condition and directed Earl to pay from proceeds of the lawsuit directly to Romero whatever sums may be due and owing him for medical services rendered by reason of the accident. When Earl later received $5,000 in settlement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Brager v. BlumDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Bonanza Motors, Inc. v. WebbIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Advance Loan Company v. KovachNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hartbarger v. Frank Paxton Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Talbott v. Roswell Hospital Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Moore v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. PartnershipNevada Supreme Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API