Legal Opinion
Stover v. FINGERHUT DIRECT MARKETING, INC.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided August 26, 2009No. 5:09-cr-00152PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants Finger-hut Direct Marketing, Inc. and CIT Bank’s Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Complaint [Docket 7]. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is DENIED. Also pending is Defendants’ Motion to Accept Filing of Reply Brief [Docket 13]. This unopposed motion is GRANTED.
/. BACKGROUND
This action arises from the allegedly unlawful efforts of Defendants Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. (Fingerhut) and CIT Bank (CIT) to collect consumer debts from Plaintiffs Carter and Brenda Stover. 1 Fingerhut is a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Credit Acceptance CorporationMassachusetts Superior Court · 2021
- Parsley v. Rushmore Loan Management Services LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2024
- Traore v. Baltimore Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023