Legal Opinion
State v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 2, 1974No. 83-71PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.
The defendant was found guilty by a jury of knowingly possessing a regulated drug. The case had proceeded to trial after a hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress certain evidence. The motion was denied.and is one of the issues raised on the appeal. After the trial, two further motions were filed, one in arrest of judgment or for a new trial based on an allegedly prejudicial juror; and another for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Both motions were denied, and the motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence was remanded from this Court for hearing and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. BruyetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- State v. DoucetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Commonwealth v. DesperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- State v. ScotchelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BenlienMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.