Legal Opinion
Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 6, 1989No. Nos. 88-1650, 88-1680, 88-1774, 88-1858PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated actions, appellants Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (“MichCon”); Michigan Gas Utilities Company (“MGU”); the State of Michigan; the Michigan Public Service Commission (“MPSC”); and William E. Long and Edwy-na G. Anderson appeal the summary judgment granted against them by the district *1297court on the ground that Michigan’s authority to regulate the interstate transportation of natural gas in this “bypass” of a local distribution company is preempted by federal law. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
A
Appellants MichCon and MGU are Michigan…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Williams Natural Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. William D. McCartyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation v. Public Service Commission Of The State Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Covey v. Surgidev Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.