Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 LAFFON GLYMPH, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-01704-JHC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 CT CORPORATION SYSTEMS, and 11 COMPUCOM, 12 Defendants. 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Laffon Glymph’s Motion for 15 Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Dkt. # 26. 16 Courts may permit indigent litigants to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) after 17 submitting an affidavit of indigency. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). “[A]n affidavit is sufficient which 18 states that one cannot because of his poverty pay or give security…