Legal Opinion

Raible v. Raydel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1954No. 33603Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The one question before the court on this appeal is whether, on the facts narrated in the statement of the case, the trial court possessed the authority to dismiss the action, and, if so, was such authority properly exercised.

It is apparent from the record that William J. Kraus, an attorney at law duly admitted to practice in the courts of Ohio, has represented Raible throughout this cause. He affixed his name as attorney to the amended petition, he was personally present during all the proceedings in the trial court and he appeared for Raible in the appeals in the Court of Appeals and in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Export & Inland Coal Corp. v. Matthew Addy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dillon v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Lutz v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API