American Export & Inland Coal Corp. v. Matthew Addy Co.

The two points upon which this controversy turns are, first, whether or not. there was any evidence entitling the plaintiff in error to have its ease submitted to the jury; and, second, whether the knowledge of Nelson B. Cramer, attorney for the defendant in error, is to be imputed to the defendant in error and it thus be chargeable therewith.

As to the first point: Is there any evidence, or a reasonable inference which can be drawn from all the evidence submitted in the record, tending to show that the Matthew Addy Company knew that it was getting Old Colony Smokeless Coal Company money? We…