Legal Opinion
Henin v. Soo Line Railroad
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 14, 2021No. 0:19-cv-00336Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Kenneth Henin, Civ. No. 19-336 (PAM/BRT) Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Soo Line Railroad Company, d/b/a Canadian Pacific, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the Motion is granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Kenneth Henin worked as a conductor at Defendant Canadian Pacific (“CP”) from 2003 until the events giving rise to this lawsuit. (Henin Dep. at 39 (Docket No. 53-1 at 14);1 see also Docket No. 53-1 at 508 (OSHA complaint stating…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Thomas Kuduk v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Paul Gunderson v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Sidney B. WHITFIELD, Appellant, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Stephenson v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.