Estate of Patterson v. Sharek
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
The primary issue before us in this appeal is whether appellants have a right to park in the rear of their property located at 2429 I Street, N.W. They challenge that portion of the trial court’s order rejecting their claim that, through adverse use, their predecessor-in-interest extinguished appel-lees’ right-of-way for automobile ingress and egress across the rearmost 25 feet of the property, leaving appellants free to park on their property as they see fit. We affirm the trial court’s ruling that appellants’ predecessor-in-interest did not acquire the right to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Leroy J. Matherne, Cross-Appellant v. Charles C. Wilson, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Allworth v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Barry Drayer v. Sidney Krasner, Leonard Miller, H. Hentz & Co., Inc. And Shearson Hayden Stone Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- McIntosh v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Chicago Board of Education v. Substance, Inc. And George N. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Araya v. KeletaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- James Thomas Martin v. Noel L. BicknellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Varnum Properties, LLC v. DC Department of Consumer and Reglatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Accenture Sub, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.