Lipscomb v. Rice
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Action by Edwin M. Lipscomb on debt against Maner L. 'Rice. Warrant of attachment was levied on property of Rice at instance of plaintiff upon the ground that he was disposing of his property with intent to defraud his creditors. Upon motion of defendant, attachment was vacated.
Read the full summary
Action by Edwin M. Lipscomb on debt against Maner L. 'Rice. Warrant of attachment was levied on property of Rice at instance of plaintiff upon the ground that he was disposing of his property with intent to defraud his creditors. Upon motion of defendant, attachment was vacated. Plaintiff appeals. cite Drake ■on Attach., sec. 4-15; Cureton v. Dargan, 12 S. C., 125; Brown v. Morrison, 10 S. C., 467; Kerchner v. McCormac, 25 S. C., 464; Meyers v. Whitehead, 24 S. C., 196. cite Whitfield v. Hovey, 30 S. C., 118; Guckenheimer v. Libbey, 42 S. C., 112; 57th Rule Circuit Court, 123; Clausen v.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice McIver.
This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Earle, setting aside a warrant of attachment, issued by the clerk of the Court' of Common Pleas for Abbeville County, in the above stated case. The notice of the motion, a copy of which is set out in the “Case,” stated that the motion would be made “on affidavits, of which copies are hereto attached.” Those affidavits, together with the original affidavit made by plaintiff when he obtained the warrants of attachment, as well as other affidavits submitted in reply by plaintiff,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Carter Grocery Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Ross v. EddinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Coker & Co. v. BarfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906