Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Zaharias M.)

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1993No. B077566PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), J.

Introduction

The issue in this mandate proceeding is whether the trial court erred in finding that Zaharias M., a 16-year-old accused of committing, along with 3 companions, a bank robbery while using a gun, was fit to be dealt with under the juvenile court law. Our analysis of case precedent and the governing statutory scheme compels the conclusion that the trial court’s decision was erroneous as a matter of law. We therefore issue a writ of mandate to compel the trial court to vacate its order and to enter an order finding Zaharias M. unfit for juvenile court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ramona R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. EDSEL P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. SHEILA O. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. Superior Court (Steven S.)California Court of Appeal · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Jones)California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. Superior Court (Jones)California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. Traughber CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Williams CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API