Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thomsen v. Jobst

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1913No. 17,062Published

Appeal from the district court for Douglas couuty: Howard Kennedy, Judge.

1DissentBarnes, J.

I am unable to concur in the opinion of the majority. The record in this case clearly shows that the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by his own negligence in using a stepladder, which the opinion concedes is an ordinary appliance, simple in its nature and construction; one which the testimony shows is customarily used in performing the particular work required of plaintiff, and on which he was engaged at the time his injuries occurred. The ladder was not defective or in any manner out of repair, and its use was entirely familiar to plaintiff, who was a skilled and. experienced mechanic. If…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Sweeney v. . Berlin and Jones Envelope Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Cahill v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. FinlaysonNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Borden v. Daisy Roller Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API