Legal Opinion · Dissent

William Dougherty v. Parsec, Inc. Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers, Local Union 100 Budco Group, Inc., Seaboard System Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1987No. 86-3482Published

1DissentGilmore, District Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. In this case, William Dougherty appeals a summary judgment entered against him in favor of one of the defendants, Seaboard System Railroad. The district judge certified the judgment as final pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). The issue is whether Dougherty can maintain an action against Seaboard Railroad System in light of the preemption provisions of Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185.

I

This is a labor dispute arising out of the firing of William Dougherty by his employer, Parsec. He has charged Parsec with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Juhasz v. Quik Shops, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Peterson v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Taylor v. Brighton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API