Legal Opinion

KREMER v. SHOYER

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1973No. Pending Decision, 272 Miscellaneous Docket 19PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Respondents Michael Franck and William P. Stewart are special counsel conducting a special judicial investigation by order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. Franck and Stewart are responsible for the formulation of charges of unethical conduct where the investigation reveals the need therefor, and for the prosecution of the formal charges. Respondent Shoyer is a judge assigned by the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia to hear and review testimony presented by the special counsel for the purpose of determining whether…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Garratt v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Jedwabny v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Martin v. Garnet Valley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Slater v. Rimar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Robertshaw Controls Co. v. Commonwealth, Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Burlington Homes, Inc. v. KassabCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API