Legal Opinion

Walker v. Connell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1933No. File No. 6124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nuessle, Ch. J.

The defendants are residents of California. On November 1, 1930, defendant Connell executed her promissory note for $3,500, and interest, payable to the plaintiff Walker one year from the date thereof. This note evidenced a debt of many years’ standing originally incurred by the defendant Connell to obtain money to protect her title to 520 acres of land in Ramsey county, North- Dakota; When the note was executed plaintiff suggested that it be secured by a mortgage on the land in question. Mrs. Connell was reluctant to execute such a mortgage. She said that all the parties had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Union National Bank v. OiumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Miller v. BartoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connell v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State Bank of Stearns v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. H. A. Thompson & Sons, Inc. v. HahnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Holden v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Northwestern National Bank & Trust Co. v. PierceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API