Legal Opinion

Holden v. Walker

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1936No. File No. 6065PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBure, J.

This action was “remanded to the trial court for the purpose of taking testimony on these two issues which the defendants are required to prove — what was the actual amount of indebtedness owing to Walker by her father at the time of conveyance, and what sums did the defendants furnish from their own private resources in order to preserve the estate.” Holden v. Walker, 63 N. D. 372, 395, 248 N. W. 318, 328. The trial court was required to take the evidence and certify and return it to this court. The burden of proof is upon the defendants to establish both issues. That the situation may be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holden v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Walker v. ConnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Bank of Stearns v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API